WTGOP Holiday Invite

WTGOP Holiday Invite Have a good time!

The Washington Township

Republican Executive Board 

Cordially Invites you to attend our  

Holiday Party  

Saturday, December 7, 2013

7 p.m. to 11 p.m.

Wedgwood Country Club

 

Buffet Dinner and Dancing, no politicing: 

Chicken Marsala

Sliced Roasted Top Round of Beef

Tortellini Carbonara

Eggplant Parmigiana

House Salad & Dinner Rolls

Dessert, Chef’s Choice

Cash Bar 

Tickets on Sale now:

$30 per person

$35 per person at the door 

           For more information please contact:

Jerry Keer 856- 228-2123  or  Mary Behm 856-374-2321  

Remember these things about the Affrodable Care Act.

Obama Care, recall, was sold with a specific set of political promises: The new regime, advocates insisted, would reduce the deficit, cover the needy, and reduce total health spending — all while lowering the premiums of those who were already insured. Back in 2007, when Obama was running for the Democratic nomination, he introduced what was then an embryonic proposal with the quixotic assurance that, “if you already have health insurance, the only thing that will change for you under this plan is the amount of money you will spend on premiums.” Then he adumbrated what would happen to the “amount of money” that Americans would “spend on premiums.” “That will be less,” Obama told anybody who would listen.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/2013/10/09/obamacare039s_broken_promises_pile_up_317397.html

Obama's Promise of "Competition" in Obama Care: Also False

You Can Keep You Plan: Also False

The Plan will be "Budget Neutral": Also False

The Senate and the House are beginning to play with adjustments to the LAW.

EVERYBODY; CALL, WRITE, MENENDEZ, BOOKER, ANDREWS, OR YOUR REPRESENTATIVE!

'Lame duck' session in N.J. could tap in-state tuition for immigrants' - Printed in South Jersey Times

We must lobby to prevent this from happening.
As a volunteer for ACLG the following  Flyer delivered to:

Senator Madden, Assemblyman Moriarty, and Assemblywoman Mosquera.

American Citizens Lobbyist Group

New Jersey

---

We the legal residents of the State of NJ request that you do not support Bill # S2479

---

"Tuition Equality Act"; allows certain students to qualify for in-State tuition rates at public institutions of higher education.

---

Reasons you should not support this Bill.

 

* A subsidized seat for illegal aliens is a seat that is not available to a child of a citizen and legal residents of New Jersey. Where is your compassion for those of us who are paying the school bills and your salaries.

 

*Once again NJ State legislators are considering a bill which ignores the interest of tax paying legal residents and ignoring the financial burden you are placing on us. We have a broken immigration system because government officials like your selves have not seen to it that our nation’s immigration laws have been enforced.

 

* Unless the State of New Jersey is prepared to offer in-state tuition to any legal resident from any state, which we are sure you aren’t because it was not mentioned in Bill # S2479, you will then be in violation of “The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996” which specifies: Ignorance of the law is no defense so read the fine print here.

 “Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an alien who is not lawfully present in the United States shall not be eligible on the basis of residence within a State (or a political subdivision) for any postsecondary education benefit unless a citizen or national of the United States is eligible for such a benefit (in no less amount, duration, and scope) without regard to whether the citizen or national is such a resident.”

 

Granting in-state tuition rates to illegal aliens would only serve to further damage and strain delicate budgets and impose additional burdens on taxpayers, who heavily subsidize post-secondary public education, to make up the loss. Schools, students, and taxpayers should not be made to bear such a burden, especially considering illegal aliens have flagrantly broken our immigration laws and have no legal right to reside in the U.S.

 

Universities are able to provide citizen and legal resident students in-state tuition rates because public colleges and universities are heavily subsidized by taxpayer money. Remember where that money comes from as most of you vote to spend our money like drunken sailors.

 

As usual if the shoe fits wear it.

 

Flip flops are available for those who want to switch to our side. 

They are available in the Governors office.

 

American Citizens Lobbyist Group-NJ

Basil Mantagas, NJ Director, 646-825-0776, bmantagas.aclg@gmail.com

11.11.13-1 Instate tuition, #S2749, Budget hearings, Th, 11.14.13

Help oppose B.O.s court packing scheme

It's absolutely critical you authorize your Free Action Fax urging your U.S. Senators to oppose Barack Obama's court-packing scheme.

https://netmail.verizon.com/netmail/driver?nimlet=deggetemail&fn=INBOX&page=1&degMid=2758&folderSelected=INBOX&uidValidity=null&sfield=Num&sorder=descending&reqReceipt=false

OBAMA SAID

OBAMA SAID:

 I think when you spread the wealth around it's good for everybody.
Barack Obama
Read more at http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/b/barack_obama_2.html#tbl4kpCWiGr27lqm.99

B. OBAMA SAID!

And we can see the positive impacts right here at Solyndra. Less than a year ago, we were standing on what was an empty lot.But through the Recovery Act, this company received a loan to expand its operations. This new factory is the result of those loans.
Barack Obama
Read more at http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/b/barack_obama_2.html#S3ZDGv1UK4Qhit4T.99

History of R's who did fight racism long ago in the Dred Scott decision

Compromise in the Dred Scott Case was unconstitutional.

Dred Scott's battle for his freedom began at the Old Courthouse in St. Louis, Missouri.


 

The Chief Justice of the United States was Roger B. Taney, a former slave owner, as were four other southern justices (non Republicans) on the Court.

The two dissenting justices of the nine-member Court were the only Republicans.

The north refused to accept a decision by a Court they felt was dominated by "Southern fire-eaters." Many Northerners, including Abraham Lincoln, felt that the next step would be for the Supreme Court to decide that no state could exclude slavery under the Constitution, regardless of their wishes or their laws.

http://www.ushistory.org/us/32a.asp

http://russp.us/racism.htm

Remember the expression; "Say it aint so, Joe"

I guess it is.

Yes Virginia, Elections were Stolen

By David Whitley / 8 November 2013 /  

Recently I attended a fundraising carnival at our local elementary school.  At one attraction I watched as some kids placed a pole with a string on it through one of several holes in a plywood wall painted to look like a fishing pond.  A parent hidden on the other side would then attach a little toy gift to a clip at the end of the string.  After a little tug on the string, the excited child would reel in their catch.  Now the little toy was the same no matter which hole through which the kid chose to drop his makeshift line and hook.

This reminds me of Tuesday's voting racket in Virginia.  No matter the choice, you end up with the same person as Governor.  The voter goes to the poll, casts a ballot and finds that someone other than whom they cast a ballot has been declared the winner.  How is this possible?  Obviously, you say, the other candidate received more votes.  Well yes and no.  There are games being played that on the surface look proper and on the up and up, but dig a little deeper and you'll find the hand in the cookie jar.

As newly elected Governor of Virginia, Terry McAuliffe celebrates his victory at the polls, but it should be pointed out that it was not fairly gained or should I say, ethically attained.  It was not a moral victory.  McAuliffe should be ashamed, but shame isn't a common part of the liberal psyche.

Most of us teach our children from the earliest of ages to play fair.  As adults, we assume adults are playing fair.  As voters, we assume our candidates and political parties are playing fair.  As viewers, we assume our media is playing fair.  Now nearly all of us who are even slightly informed know that the media and the political parties spin almost everything, if not out and out lie to us.  And unfortunately, the game of politics, far too often, has become the same shell game of lies, character assassination and subversion of the process.

Politics is a game, like any other.  But over the years it has become a shrewd game.  Tactics and strategy are employed, huge amounts of money are spent.  However, there is a hypocrisy involved.  Unlike the "loopholes" in the tax code that liberals scream about as unfair -- there are "loopholes" in politics that liberals love to exploit.  Loopholes that are used to undermine or rig the voting game in favor of their side, their candidate.

Subversive tactics are nothing new.  But subversive tactics, no matter who is doing it, are unethical and undermine liberty, rather than enhance it.  As the Founding Fathers repeatedly warned us, liberty cannot prevail in the absence of virtue.

When I was working in Iowa in 1996 for the Pat Buchanan campaign, others working for another GOP candidate were suspected of subversive actions against the Buchanan campaign, by doing such unethical things as cancelling reservations for hotel rooms and chartered buses in order to throw chaos into the entourage of campaign staff and media.  This sent our side scrambling, wasting valuable time and focus undoing the damage.  And this from (while adversaries) other Republicans, other supposed conservatives.  If this seems even a little over the top, most voters couldn't begin to imagine what happens between campaign staff when it's a general election (especially a national election), Democrat versus Republican.  Do or die!  The gloves come off.  It's nasty!

In the Virginia Governor race, the will of the people was thwarted.  Not because of any voting machine irregularities or polling place intimidation or lost ballots.  The election was stolen because the Democrat Party and the McAuliffe campaign colluded in bringing in third party candidate, Libertarian Robert C. Sarvis by assisting him with donations ensuring his ability to get on the ballot.  He was specifically helped with donations from liberal software billionaire bundler Joe Liemandt.  This subversive, unethical tactic was to skim off enough conservative leaning libertarian votes to Sarvis, swaying a close election into McAuliffe's favor.  Their plan worked like a charm!

With 7% of the vote, Robert C. Sarvis effectively took the election away from Cuccinelli and gave it to McAuliffe.  The plan worked masterfully.  McAuliffe has been declared the winner, yet had those 7% (which the bulk most likely would have) gone to Ken Cuccinelli, he would have easily been the winner and next Governor of Virginia.

So you see how the people of Virginia (or any other state) collectively can vote conservative/libertarian and still end up with a liberal Democrat governor or Senator?  It is called divide and conquer.  It's called pitting one against another.  It's how those who love and believe deeply in liberty keep their government in the hands of socialists and never seem to figure out why.

The problem with politics today is that while it is fun and exciting, invigorating, informative and sometimes frustrating for some of us, it has become tactically an unethical game of cheaters who prosper. The ultimate victim is liberty and the Republic herself.

"Sell not virtue to purchase wealth, nor Liberty to purchase power," Benjamin Franklin warned.  Yet we seem not to take this truth seriously by holding those who would subvert liberty to the humility of defeat.  Instead we give them the power for which their addiction is so desirous -- that they will lie and cheat in order to attain it.

Power in the hands of the unwise and the corrupt will surely be abused. I predict it won't be long before McAuliffe and his band of lying cheats find themselves in some hot water for voter related or unrelated crimes.

Jefferson warned us that "The cornerstone of democracy rests on the foundation of an educated electorate."  Once on your hook, don't let these bottom dwellers get away with putting bait fish on your line and telling you to be happy with your catch. Read more at http://eaglerising.com/2768/yes-virginia-elections-stolen/#rVmb8wMidmb22V2l.99

It seems like they have this down to a science.

I'm trying, How about you?

If you have friends in other states get them to do this. This letter was mailed to all three on Friday morning.

November 7, 2013

The Honorable Robert Menendez
United States Senate
528 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510-3002

The Honorable Robert E. Andrews
United States House of Representatives
2265 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515-3001

Elliot Goldberg

View Point Page Editor

South Jersey Times

309 South Broad Street

Woodbury, NJ 08096

 

Subject: Open letter of request for corrective actions as related to the Affordable Care Act

Gentlemen;

As a New Jersey Citizen I am appealing to you as members of Congress for the initiation of corrective actions. The entering of personal information into the internet as required by the Affordable Care Act is placing the citizens of this State as well as the Citizens of the United States as subjects to easy access for bank fraud or other felonious activities. Please initiate immediate steps to protect us. I am a citizen and have been subject through doctor offices that are compelled to enter our records into the ACA required data base. As an example during my wife’s first visit to a specialist, she was given an I-pad and told to enter her information into this device to facilitate the entry to the internet data base. I told her to give the I-pad back to the receptionist.

Since you are not subject to the ACA please consider the risk of publishing your Social Security Numbers, home addresses, telephone numbers and other personal data on the internet. This will place you in the same risk as we, the other citizens.

Sincerely Yours

 

 

Gerald Keer

Turnersville, NJ 08012

 

Numbers losing health insurance

Do you get the feeling there is something wrong with the voting population?
If 800,000 insured lost their health insurance, how many were truly affected?
When I worked and my employer provided a portion of the health insurance while I paid the remainder of the premium. The insurance covered myself and my wife. If one half of the cancellations were for married people, does it mean there were 1,200,000 who lost coverage?

It is too early to tell

The NEWS MEDIA is full of Chris Christie coverage. The question is will he be running in 2016. The answer is what difference does it make.
The real question is will he be RINO in the next three years? Who else will be NON_RINO?
Yes it is great that he has balance the budget. Why didn't he, or was he so quiet that  he did endorse Niki Trunk against Sweeney?
On the local scene and the state scene how much did he do for the other Republicans who are probably less RINO than He?
The Tea Party is heavily focused on Obama that we seem to be overlooking the local or state races.
In 2014 Andrews must be beaten.
Ar there conservative in the lesser races- regardless of party?

It is your money that Congress hands themselves!

So you are thinking about retiring!

"... consider that the U.S. Census Bureau says the average public worker with a pension gets about $26,000 a year!

And Wait Until You Get a Load of This ...
Guess how much members of Congress CONTRIBUTE to their defined benefit pension plans?
Most members participating in the FERS system pay in just 1.3% of their salary every year.
Meanwhile, the Congress of the United States contributes 18.7% of their salary on their behalf.

That's a 14-to-1 match!
And remember, members of Congress can get additional matching contributions worth as much as ANOTHER $17,500 a year if they participate in the separate 401(k)-style plan available to them!

Now, it is true that Congress recently reformed the FERS plan — but only for NEW members.
Isn't that hilarious?

Our elected representatives all got in a room and agreed that their retirement program was a bit too cushy. Yet the majority also agreed that their own entitlements should absolutely stay the same!
If this doesn't demonstrate exactly the type of "ourselves over everyone else" mentality I'm talking about, I don't know what would.

Read the full article: http://www.easystreetinvesting.com/