CENSUS

Just think how horrible it is that a resident should receive a political flyer that used the topic of the National Census as a ruse to obtain a political poll. Did the terrible Republicans pull a scam? If you read or listen closely the Democrat candidates want everyone to be a voter regardless of citizenship or criminal status.

The census is required per the Constitution. Legislative districts can change. Some change is called Gerrymandered, to create political balances advantages. Voting districts will be changed to assure national representation. Your district might have had an increase in the number of residents. If the number is based upon citizenship it should change.

 Seems that a few years ago there was a NJ Republican State Legislator named Dominic DiCicco who was unseated because the in-power Democrat party changed the legislative boundary and placed the gentleman into the district that is overly Democrat registration. DiCicco’s sin was sponsorship of legislation restricting Property Taxes to a maximum of two percent. Our NJ Legislature fixed that by allowing exceptions so the pocket books remained open to the money grabbers.

We don't change state lines. Not only will the State districts be affected, National Congressional districts can change to be certain citizenry is represented according to a State’s population. Thus the Electoral College prevents two or three areas from overriding the National wishes.
When, or if, you receive your National Census questionnaire, write in, with a broad point pen, in capital letters, and indicate your citizenship as; 1. Natural born, 2. Naturalized, or 3. Pending approval. Our Nation deserves and needs to have citizens only vote, not just those who have bought a driver license. Democrats went to court to avoid citizenship indicated.

Gerald Keer

Intersting E-mail recived

The "requirement" by the left for "Judges" to be "pro-Abortion" is NOT about the woman's right to choose

no more than the "Climate Narrative" is about "protecting the environment" !

It is about the value a "Judge" places upon LIFE itself.

Slavery was "Legal"

Discrimination was "Legal"

the Holocaust was "Legal"

Abortion IS "Legal"!

Do you think the perpetrators of the Holocaust concerned with the value of Jewish lives?

I find it interesting that the same group who promote abortion are promoting

Foreign Nationals come into this country to have their babies,

to get "drivers licenses",

to collect "government assistance"

and to VOTE !

Also consider this context:

If government can tax (enslave) its corporate creations ("Fictions of Law" - "non entities")

then does that justify allowing the government (those in power) to Tax (enslave) living human beings?

Note: To take from another is either theft or the result of slavery by a "master"!

Do the Math:

Businesses must have (are "allowed") its "investment restored" without taxation

yet people are prevented from having THEIR "investment",

aka Life, aka Time, aka Financial Equivalent, restored!

That is to say; "Your life has NO value! You are therefore a SLAVE!"

The president does not have to give tax breaks to regular workers since regular workers are not lawfully subject to taxation in the first place!

e.g. "What is the value of exempting someone from "not existing" when very few would chose to "not exist" in the first place?"

A "corporate entity" can cease to exist at any time and then "re exist" at any time later!

Can the same be said of people?

Does that make government GOD? NO!

It just makes government another form of Cartoonist

much like creating a cartoon "blowing it up' and then "resurrecting" it

only to be "blown up" again and again much like Wiley Coyote?

What corruption via freedom of speech

We are subjected to a nightmare of political nonsense created and shown on television programs which can be reflective of party allegiance. Our Constitution's freedom of speech has been corrupted into poor manners. There were times when talking heads from News Stations were expected to follow a level of decorum that avoided insults and character assassination. As this is written I know that people will jump to point at President Trump. Trump became the candidate, who unlike Mitt Romney, fought the title of “a basket of deplorable’s”, and stood his ground against political insults, while he gave as good, or more than he received. The common criticism is he is not a nice man.

How far back must we go to recall use of the appellation of a Senator calling President G. W. Bush, Hitler? Back a few lesser years to the time identifying any opponent of President B. Obama as a racist. Today we have a Show Titled the "View". The show is the epitome of bad manners wherein guests are assaulted for their opinions. This especially coming from a supposed comedian who made fame and fortune by use of the “f” bomb on cable television. Recently Professor Dershowitz was a guest insulted and yammered over by the voices of MS Behar, Goldberg and O’Donnell, et al.

Over the years Presidents have been cited for their moral faults. I cannot go much further back than Roosevelt (Franklin) who was rumored to have a mistress, then Eisenhower (female driver during WW II), Kennedy (Marilyn Et al), Nixon (Burglary), Reagan (Divorced), Clinton (Impeached for ....). Who is counting? Let them throw their rocks. Let them have their hatred and impeach again between now and November 2024.  We will elect Trump again regardless of the name calling.

Gerald Keer