Monday, December 21, 2015

Phyllis Schlafly: Is Trump Last Hope for America?

The First Lady of the GOP quotes Trump:

“If anyone needs more evidence of why the American people are suffering at the hands of their own government, look no further than the budget deal announced by Speaker Ryan. In order to avoid a government shutdown, a cowardly threat from an incompetent president, the elected Republicans in Congress threw in the towel and showed absolutely no budget discipline.”

Sunday, December 20, 2015

Why is Trump Our Last, Best Hope?

The British have acknowledged Trump is our Last, Best HopeNow, the Canadians are doing the same.

What is wrong with the US that we have no Reaganite with a fire in the belly? Where is Goldwater when you need him?  Where, for that matter, is Nixon?

Here is Conrad Black,

 In Defense of Donald Trump".

The principal news about Donald Trump’s candidacy for the U.S. Republican presidential nomination is not the sometimes controversial things that he says, but the increasingly hysterical responses to him from the traditionally respectable political quarters that he discomforts.

Sunday, December 13, 2015

A reminder as to who wrote our Constitution



  In the following I have take liberty to highlight in red certain passages.Read the following and see how it might have or would have reigned in today's politicians.

 

Five items Congress deleted from Madison’s original Bill of Rights


National Constitution Center

As Constitution Daily counts down to Bill of Rights Day on December 15, we are looking at some fascinating facts about the iconic document. 
When James Madison spoke to the First Congress he proposed 20 amendments for a Bill of Rights, and not the 10 we all know about. So what did Congress delete from the final list that was ratified by the states?




View photo
.
James_Madison_cropped1
There were some very significant deletions as his proposed list went through the House and Senate, and Madison himself took part in the decisions to edit out some of his own ideas.
In the end, 12 of the 20 amendments survived the congressional approval process. Enough states approved 10 of those 12 amendments to make the Bill of Rights a reality on December 15, 1791. One of two bypassed amendments was eventually ratified in 1992 as the 27th Amendment; it restricted the ability of Congress to change its pay while in session. (The other proposed amendment dealt with the number of representatives in Congress, based on the 1789 population.)
But if Madison had his original way, our Constitution would have a two-part Preamble that includes part of Thomas Jefferson’s Declaration of Independence before the current preamble.
On June 8, 1789, Madison told Congress the Preamble needed a “pre-Preamble.”

“First. That there be prefixed to the Constitution a declaration, that all power is originally vested in, and consequently derived from, the people.
That Government is instituted and ought to be exercised for the benefit of the people; which consists in the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the right of acquiring and using property, and generally of pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety.

That the people have an indubitable, unalienable, and indefeasible right to reform or change their Government, whenever it be found adverse or inadequate to the purposes of its institution.”
In essence, Madison wanted to bury arguably the most famous sentence in American history, “We the People,” in the middle of a combined Preamble. (The desires of the Tea Party)
Roger Sherman of Connecticut was among the first to question the move to downplay “We the People.”
“The truth is better asserted than it can be by any words what so ever.  The words ‘We the People’ in the original Constitution are as copious and expressive as possible,” he said. And in time, Congress deleted the entire “pre-Preamble” as the Bill of Rights went through committees. (Sounds like the actions of today's RINO)
Another item that Madison proposed was making sure at least three of the liberties guaranteed in the Bill of Rights applied to all states.
“No State shall violate the equal rights of conscience, or the freedom of the press, or the trial by jury in criminal cases,” Madison said in the fifth part of his original Bill of Rights proposal.
The selective incorporation of parts of the Bill of Rights to the states didn’t happen until the early part of the 20th century as the Supreme Court interpreted the 14th Amendment’s Due Process Clause in a series of cases.
Madison also wanted to clearly spell out that each branch of government had clear, distinct roles.
“The powers delegated by this Constitution are appropriated to the departments to which they are respectively distributed: so that the Legislative Department shall never exercise the powers vested in the Executive or Judicial, nor the Executive exercise the powers vested in the Legislative or Judicial, nor the Judicial exercise the powers vested in the Legislative or Executive Departments,” he said in the last part of his proposed Bill of Rights.
Neither of these items made it through the congressional review process. But Madison felt strongly enough about the  separation of powers clause that he wanted it as the new Article VII in the Constitution.
And the second part of the new “Article VII” did survive in the Bill of Rights. It read, “The powers not delegated by this Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively.”
Another interesting twist in Madison’s proposed Bill of Rights was a different version of what became the Second Amendment.
“The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed; a well armed and well regulated militia being the best security of a free country: but no person religiously scrupulous of bearing arms shall be compelled to render military service in person,” said Madison. (However we did have the Conscientious Objectors)
And the final, big difference that Madison wanted was the entire Bill of Rights interwoven within the Constitution, and not appended at the document’s end.
That idea didn’t pass muster with Congress because there were concerns of an appearance that the Constitution was being rewritten. Madison dropped his support of “interweaving” the amendments during the House debate about moving his already amended Bill of Rights to the Senate.
In the end, many of the core ideas introduced by Madison in June 1789 made it into the ratified version of the Bill of Rights.
“I think we should obtain the confidence of our fellow citizens, in proportion as we fortify the rights of the people against the encroachments of the government,” Madison said in his address to Congress.

Saturday, December 12, 2015

I've Changed. This Is War. Seal the Borders. Stop the Visas

Larry Kudlow:

We may set back tourism. We may anger Saudi princes whose kids are in American schools. But so be it. We need a wartime footing if we are going to protect the American homeland.

Of course, President Obama doesn't get it. He never will. Already we should have led NATO into a declaration of war against ISIS. Already we should have pushed a resolution of war against ISIS through the U.N. Security Council. Already we should have convened meetings with our Middle East allies to formally declare war against ISIS. Already the U.S. Congress should have issued a formal declaration of war against ISIS.


The president had his last chance last Sunday night. And he didn't take it. He is not a wartime commander in chief. In fact, he is not a commander in chief.

Read the rest at Real Clear Politics

Friday, December 4, 2015

Pat Buchanan on Why the Liberal Media Hates Trump

The silent majority asks the press, “Who are you to tell us whom we may nominate? 
You are not our friends. You are not going to vote for us. 
And the names you call Trump – bigot, racist, xenophobe, sexist – are the names you call us
nothing but cuss words that a corrupt establishment uses on those it most detests.”

Read Pat Buchanan's full editorial: 

Thursday, December 3, 2015

What does the Tea Party ask OF YOU

Each day I receive solicitations for dollars.

The Gloucester County Tea Party does not drum for money.
We ask for; your voices. activism, and call to congressmen and senators.
We ask that you vote.
Express your opinions.
Write to your news-media.
Fly the flag.

SUPPORT and  Vote for People that are true conservatives.
Teach your family honesty, the principles of the Constitution,
Support lower taxes by resisting wasteful spending,
Support allegiance to the flag.
We have laws that are to protect your rights.
Do not support people that would ignore your rights. 

Learn who  the 2016 candidates for all offices are and choose the Conservative!

Saturday, November 28, 2015

And we send $$$$'s to support the United Nations

U.N. Will Hold Summit To Fight Warming But Not To Defeat Terror

Police officers gather outside the main entrance of the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Le Bourget, outside Paris, on Friday, Nov. 27,...
Police officers gather outside the main entrance of the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Le Bourget, outside Paris, on Friday, Nov. 27,... View Enlarged Image
Priorities: The Paris climate summit begins Monday amid demands that something be done about the warming "threat." Yet a more serious danger — Islamic terrorism — gets no similar conference of its own. This is madness.
The United Nations can turn out the people when it wants to. As many as 40,000 are expected for the 21st session of the Conference of Parties to the U.N.'s Framework Convention on Climate Change, which will run through Dec. 11.
There will be more than 190 nations represented, and at least 140 national leaders will attend, all sounding important but none doing anything of real substance.
But that's the point. These summits are for show. Every speaker, presenter and expert in Paris will expound endlessly on the evils of climate change, and they will all agree that the problem cannot be ignored.
Too bad the U.N. can't work up the same sort of exuberantly hyped, large-scale conference to create a committed and serious-minded coalition that will snuff out terrorism.
We understand, though. That would require hard work and genuine dedication.
Fighting global warming is easy, though. It's not a real enemy. It didn't kill and maim hundreds in Paris earlier this month.
No one knows, nor will ever know, if man-made climate change even exists outside of imaginative thinking and flawed computer models. So no one can ever know if it's defeated or not.
But climate change is a handy windmill for leaders to tilt against. Their sincere opposition to it makes them look, they think, like heavyweight statesmen and global superstars seeking a solution.
This also happens on the national stage. Fred Barnes has observed in the Weekly Standard that "President Obama and Democrats can't stop talking about" climate change. Obama has even called the Paris global warming summit "a powerful rebuke to the terrorists" because they will see the world stand "as one."
Could a president have ever uttered a more cynical statement than that? It has to be an effort to intentionally mislead and obscure, because no one could truly believe those words.
Yet the political left yearns to hear them, and Democrats happily supply them. Meanwhile, a real threat that has killed thousands of innocents and threatens to kill thousands more gets no U.N. summit.
Yes, we've heard that climate change causes terrorism. No, we don't believe that is anywhere near reality.
The Paris climate summit does not serve the dual purpose of fighting both global warming and terrorism. It's primary purpose is to provide presidents, prime ministers, premiers and thousands of global bureaucrats with a forum to pretend that they're doing something.
The meeting is a vehicle, as well, for those who spend the rest of the year using the global warming scare as a weapon to destroy capitalism and install a new economic system across the world.
Worse, leaders from nations that are prosperous thanks to capitalism aid the destroyers by perpetuating the man-made global warming narrative. If only they'd pursue terrorists with the same vigor.
Follow us: @IBDinvestors on Twitter | InvestorsBusinessDaily on Facebook

Thursday, November 26, 2015

Be Thankful for the Declaration of Independence!



  •  READ THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE


In 1776, fifty-six patriots signed a document that changed history. In 2008, millions of citizens voted for a candidate and that vote changed history. A portion of the principles and ideals in that 1776 Document are;

Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it…….. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations,…………….under absolute Despotism, it is their (the peoples) right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies (States); and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government.” (or President)

That portion of our Declaration of Independence provides the reasoning to change our form of government, and our dissolution from the English Crown. Our current duty is to direct our President, telling him the time has come for him to listen or go. If his executive fiats and orders are not cause for impeachment then the time has come for the people that represent us to send a vitriolic message to the person, Barack Obama, whom few of us know and certainly feel is in opposition to our country. Maybe it is a good time for those who voted, twice, to volunteer to house and financially support these so called refugees.

  “And whoever emigrates for the cause of Allah will find on the earth many locations to settle and wide abundance.  And whoever leaves his home as an emigrant for the sake of Allah and His Messenger, and then death overtakes him, his reward has already been established with Allah.  And Allah is ever Forgiving and Merciful.”  —Koran 4:100