Tuesday, May 30, 2017

Copied from "RealClear Politics", Another reason to dump Politicians

This is what the people who run for office do. Money every where.

FULL MEASURE: An exclusive first look at a new report that says you can put a price on success when it comes to Congress. The report by Issue One exposes the secretive money system in which members of Congress "buy" top spots on the most powerful committees. To raise the money, they often collect from the very interests their committees are supposed to oversee.

Transcript via Full Measure with Sharyl Attkisson:

Nick Penniman: It's not only a powerful position, it's a perverse system. In fact, it's the inverse of what we all as citizens should want.

Sharyl: Nick Penniman leads the group - Issue One. Its new report The Price of Power exposes how members of Congress serve as cash cows for their party’s political machinery. The best fundraisers are rewarded with powerful positions that decide the laws affecting all of us. Insiders report both parties have similar systems of “dues” that members have to pay every two years by raising money directly for the party. That’s called “dialing for dollars;” and by giving some of their campaign funds to the party and to colleagues facing tough races. How much they raise determines who gets ahead.

Penniman: What we should want is that people rise in stature because of merit, not because of money. And right now, it's money over merit.

Sharyl: As an example, ordinary Republicans have six-figure party “dues.” But it takes more to make the ranks of leadership.

Sharyl: How much does a committee chairmanship cost?

Penniman: So, if you want to be the chairman of a major committee in Congress, and you're Republican, you've got to deliver 1.2 million to the Republican National Congressional Committee. Democrats, it's about the same thing.

Sharyl: It's almost like paying for the privilege of obtaining a certain position.

Penniman: It is borderline extortion.

Sharyl: It’s a far cry from bygone days. In the 1960s a mere $100 donation could get you not only dinner with congressional candidate Shirley Temple, but also host Bing Crosby. Today, besides the $1.2 million required of “A” committee chairmen, Republicans who chair secondary “B” committees are expected to raise $875,000 in dues. The top Republican in the House, as Speaker, has to raise $20 million dollars. The number two, Majority Leader $10 million. Such details, held tightly to the vest for years, come from some of the 180 former public officials who belong to “Issue One’s” bipartisan “ReFormers Caucus” and say they’re sick of money’s influence in politics.

Sharyl: Former Congresswoman Connie Morella.

Connie Morella: I think we have reached crisis proportions when it comes to money. A member of Congress devotes almost one-third of every day to raising money.

Sharyl: Former Senate Majority leader Tom Daschle.

Tom Daschle: People leave on Thursday. They come back on Tuesday and try to govern on Wednesday these days and you can’t run a country this complicated with the challenges we face and spend so little time doing so.

Sharyl: Former Labor Secretary Bill Brock.

Bill Brock: If you tell me the problem of money in politics, the distortions that it creates is just gonna keep getting worse, shoot me. Shoot me.

Zach Wamp: It's a flawed system and it's like a nuclear arms race. The Democrats do more of it because the Republicans do more of it.

Sharyl: Tennessee Republican Zach Wamp co-chairs the ReFormer’s Caucus. He was in Congress from 1995 to 2011.

Sharyl: How are the members told how much money that they ought to raise?

Wamp: So, the committees, usually in the spring, and they just did this a month ago. They come out with a quota and it basically says that if you're a chairman of a regular committee, it's X dollars, and if you're a chairman of an A committee, an exclusive committee, it's even higher. If there's enough money in your campaign account, you can just cut a check, or, if you don't have enough money, you have to go over in what's called 'dialing for dollars'. You sit in a little booth, they give you a list, you call people that you don't know who don't want you to call them, by the way, and you ask them for money, you tell them we have this spring event coming up, and maybe President Trump is going to be there, and will you please dedicate 10 or 25 thousand dollars or 50,000 dollars to this dinner and they keep a total of it, and you see people advance to committee chairmanships and into leadership, based on how much time they spend during the work day, taxpayer expense, making calls, shaking down the special interests.

Sharyl: With all that pressure to raise money, sometimes these committee members are raising it from the interest they're supposed to regulate, true?

Wamp: Well, not only do they, they actually intentionally give you those lists of people that have something to do with your committees, because they know that they're the ones that are most likely to say yes.

Sharyl: Doesn't that pervert the system by which the members of these committees become beholden to the very people that they're supposed to regulate or oversee?

Wamp: Of course, yes.

Sharyl: For example, the House Financial Services Committee oversees matters involving everything from Wall Street and insurance to the stock exchanges.

Penniman: The big joke in Washington is that the financial services committee is called the cash committee. Not because it deals with finances, but because just being on it allows you to raise so much money from bank lobbyists and bankers that it's like an ATM machine. The cash just pours in.

Sharyl: On the heels of the mortgage crisis, as the financial services committee considered new regulations on banking and real estate, money poured in from those industries. From 2009 to 2016, the Republican chairman of the committee, Jeb Hensarling, raised $10.1 million, half of it from finance, insurance and real estate interests. He transferred $8.6 million of it to the National Republican Campaign Committee and other House Republicans. The committee’s lead Democrat, Maxine Waters, raised $3.7 million, one-quarter of it from finance, insurance and real estate donors. She transferred about $798,000 of that to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and other House Democrats. Hensarling and Waters didn’t respond to our requests for comment.

Sharyl: If there are members on the Financial Services Committee and they're having to raise that much money, and they're taking it from the banks they regulate, who's going to have the leg up when it comes to the kinds of laws that they support?

Penniman: The kind of sad joke in Washington is you "lean towards the green". And when you're on the Financial Services Committee, let's say, and most of your money or a big chunk of your money's coming from bank lobbyists that you’re supposed to be regulating, unfortunately you’re probably going to lean more towards what they want.

Sharyl: The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and National Republican Campaign Committee didn’t respond to our repeated requests for interviews and comment.

Wamp: The system is so bad that the members hate it. Members of Congress hate to do it. The people they're calling hate to be called.

Sharyl: What happens if they buck it? If someone says, I'm not going to raise this money?

Wamp: You won't advance and they'll put their thumb down on you, they even ridicule you publicly at the meetings; this person is not making the calls. They're not raising the money.

Sharyl: So, while they might rather be taking care of the people’s business, many spend countless hours catering to the interests that will help them pay their party dues.

Wamp: And I hate to use this word, but it makes prostitutes out of our elected officials. When the leadership says, if you want to advance, you have to demean yourself and go over there at taxpayer time and make phone calls to people that don't even want to talk to you, asking them for money for your party so that you can somehow advance the cause of good government.

It really needs to change and it's going to take the country, because I can tell you, they're not going to change it because they're stuck in the system and they're proliferating against each other, the two parties.

Monday, May 29, 2017

2013' re-assment cost millions so they could upgrade your property TAXES.



It is about time to stop the property tax creeps

If you improve your property the following is typical. In other words if you maintain you home such as new siding, new windows, a patio, you will pay more to the township. This is a negative effect to good neighbors. Taxation should be based on the size of the land and the basic square footage of the house or building. Municipalities would not need to hire consultants to examine the home and charge you more money because you improved the bath room or kitchen or attic.
Q. When I obtain a Building Permit to improve my property (examples: siding, kitchen or bathroom renovation, construction of a family room or bedroom dormer) when and how will my property assessment be increased?
A. After a representative from the assessor's office inspects the property (in its entirety), the property is assessed at the current market value (as of October 1). The added assessment is the amount of the difference between the old assessment and the value of the entire property at the end of the project, not the amenity itself or cost of the job. The property must be valued from scratch. The result is adjusted to the same valuation date as the date of the last town wide revaluation so that everyone has the same base year for assessment. The assessment is calculated as of October 1 and prorated for the months that it was complete. The completion date is determined by the Assessor according to "readiness for intended use" and not by the date of the final inspection. In cases where it was completed during the prior year, an omitted added assessment bill will also be received. All bills are sent out by the Tax Collector by October 25 and due payable, in full, on the following November 1. The dates for added and omitted added assessments, as well as the time frame in which the bills are mailed out and due payable, are mandated by the State of New Jersey.


Jerry Keer

Remeber UNCLE JOE & LONG GONE JON CORZINE, comments by GJK

LYNDHURST - Former Vice President Joe Biden vouched for gubernatorial candidate Phil Murphy Sunday, saying the Democratic front-runner knows how to reach those voters who shunned the party last fall.

We shunned the party because they remembered B. Obama . GJK

 Biden said Murphy, who, like he did, grew up in a working-class household, could address the fears of those who have seen their jobs move overseas or replaced by automation, the same people who voted for President Donald Trump last fall.

Hiding the years at  the old connection to Goldman Sachs and fund raising for Obama. GJK

"There are a lot of people out there who are frightened," Biden told an estimated 1,200 people at the Lyndhurst Recreation Center. "Trump played on their fears. We haven't spoken enough to the fears and aspirations of the people we come from. There's so much we can do. And Phil's spoken to it."

Who is Phil Murphy?
He spent 23 years at Goldman Sachs and then served as the U.S. ambassador to Germany. Now he is the Democratic front-runner in this year's New Jersey governor's race.
Biden was the featured speaker the get-out-the-vote rally for Murphy, a former Goldman Sachs executive and U.S. ambassador to Germany, in advance of the June 6 Democratic gubernatorial primary.
"We've got to get up and put one foot in front of another," Biden said as he stood next to Murphy in front of a sea of blue and green signs. "We are no longer going to stand around and wait.''
They left the stage to Bon Jovi's "We Weren't Born to Follow."
Murphy served as finance chairman of the Democratic National Committee and contributed the maximum $4,600 to President Barack Obama's 2008 campaign and $100,000 to his inaugural committee before being tapped as an ambassador.

Biden also vouched for Hillary. GJK

Biden said he traveled to Germany at the suggestion of the late Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.) in advance of the 2013 gubernatorial election to urge Murphy to get involved in New Jersey politics.
"I went because I thought, and Frank insisted, that this guy had all the stuff not only to be our ambassador but to be a great political leader for us," Biden said.
Murphy declined to run at that time but has emerged this year as the front-runner for the Democratic nomination to succeed Gov Chris Christie.

The old saw that there is no health care for women without Planned Parenthood. If Obama care was their cure all   why are there so many people payin high premiums for poor coverage? GJK

As he took the stage with Biden, Murphy pledged to stand up to Trump, who has moved to defund the women's heath care provider Planned Parenthood, increase the use of fossil fuels such as oil and coal, and cut taxes for wealthy Americans while reducing spending for food stamps, Medicaid and children's health coverage.

 The old scare tactics. Have the rich received a tax increase or is the truth that everyone deserves a cut in their tax load? GJK

"We're going to have to deal with a hostile administration coming out of Washington," Murphy said. "We're going to need a governor - and I will be that governor - with a steel backbone who says, 'Mr. Trump, not in New Jersey will you do that.'"
Biden said the race has attracted national, as well as international, attention as one of only two gubernatorial contests this November. The other one is in Virginia.
This is the single most important race in the country in the next three years before the presidential race," Biden said. "The whole country - and without exaggeration, the world - is going to look at it. They're going to see if America bought into this crass and uncomfortable rhetoric or whether we are able to re-establish and reassert who we are."
Rep. Bill Pascrell Jr. (D-9th Dist.), who spoke at the rally and is backing Murphy, said he was buoyed by the size of the crowd for Murphy.
"Primaries are usually lightly attended, " Pascrell said. "This is a good sign for Murphy."
A recent Stockton University survey gave Murphy - who has spent $18.4 million on the race, nearly four times as much the other 10 major-party candidates combined - 34 percent in the Democratic primary race.
He was followed by former U.S. Treasury official Jim Johnson with 10 percent and state Assemblyman John Wisniewski (D-Middlesex) with 9 percent. The poll had a margin of error of 3.5 percentage points.
Murphy has the endorsement of all 21 Democratic county organizations, giving him the top line in the June 6 primary.
Jonathan D. Salant may be reached at jsalant@njadvancemedia.com. Follow him on Twitter @JDSalant or on Facebook. Find NJ.com Politics on Facebook.

The COST of STUDENT DEBT

Americans Are Paying $38 to Collect $1 of Student Debt

Student loan defaults are a bonanza for the debt collection industry.
Shahien Nasiripour
May 19, 2017, 9:39 AM EDT


The federal government has, in recent years, paid debt collectors close to $1 billion annually to help distressed borrowers climb out of default and scrounge up regular monthly payments. New government figures suggest much of that money may have been wasted.
Nearly half of defaulted student-loan borrowers who worked with debt collectors to return to good standing on their loans defaulted again within three years, according to an analysis by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. For their work, debt collectors receive up to $1,710 in payment from the U.S. Department of Education each time a borrower makes good on soured debt through a process known as rehabilitation. They keep those funds even if borrowers subsequently default again, contracts show. The department has earmarked more than $4.2 billion for payments to its debt collectors since the start of the 2013 fiscal year, federal spending data show.
The findings, gleaned from the bureau’s analysis of about 600,000 borrower accounts, come as the Trump administration weighs a shakeup of the government’s student loan program. For years, defaults have mounted despite the improving U.S. economy and the money invested in collecting education debt. Education Secretary Betsy DeVos pledged earlier this year to “do a better job” than the Obama administration at managing the department’s loan contractors. Last week, DeVos suggested that the feds should “start afresh.”
Officials at the CFPB say the government should reexamine whether the loan program, and the lucrative contracts it bestows on private firms, is working for the millions of Americans struggling to repay their taxpayer-backed student debt.
“When student loan companies know that nearly half of their highest-risk customers will quickly fail, it's time to fix the broken system that makes this possible,” said Seth Frotman, the consumer bureau’s top student-loan official.
Debt collectors aggressively angle for new business from the Education Department because the contracts are among the most lucrative in the industry. The government values the latest round at $2.8 billion.
The government often pays debt collectors nearly 40 times what they bring in, federal records show. Take the government's rehabilitation program, which targets people who have defaulted on their debt—meaning they missed nine months of payments. If a borrower subsequently makes nine on-time monthly payments of as little as $5 during a 10-month period, their loans are returned to good standing and the default is supposed to be wiped from their credit reports 1 . But the CFPB found that more than 40 percent of these borrowers defaulted again within three years.
Even when borrowers don't default, debt collection efforts often yield little. Close to 80 percent of borrowers who rehabilitate their debt make the minimum $5 monthly payment, according to a 2015 estimate by the National Council of Higher Education Resources, a lobbying group that represents student debt collectors and servicers. That means the Education Department is paying its debt collectors up to $1,710 per borrower to collect around $45, regardless of whether the borrower continues to make her payments.
The arrangement means that debt collectors “have no ‘skin in the game,’” Frotman wrote in an October report.
The consumer bureau estimates that the vast majority of borrowers who rehabilitate their defaulted debt with $5 monthly payments are eligible for $0 payments after they exit default, under an income-based repayment plan. But about 90 percent of debtors who rehabilitated their debt failed to enroll in these programs, according to the CFPB’s analysis. All that's needed to enroll is some paperwork that enables contracted loan servicers to confirm borrowers' annual earnings, but experts inside and outside the government say they don't know why this step isn't completed, and distressed borrowers are left stuck in debt collectors' sights. The Education Department, which rewards its loan servicers with more business if the loans they service remain in good standing, excludes rehabilitated loans when grading its servicers' performance.
The consumer bureau says slipshod loan servicing—the business of counseling borrowers on their options and sending them monthly bills—is largely to blame. NCHER President James Bergeron said the feds need to simplify the various repayment plans they offer and "do a better job" helping previously defaulted borrowers get into repayment plans. Calls and emails to the Education Department weren’t returned.
"I don't see how anyone wins from this system other than the collection industry," said Adam S. Minsky, a Boston-based lawyer who represents student debtors.

jscheidell@comcast.net

Sunday, May 21, 2017

Borrow any protion for your letter of complaint



Politicians have it easy. They are paid by your taxes, which they think will never run out. They run for office promising to work for us. And we believe them. They pass new laws and old laws; Such as Truth in Advertising. We have the Federal Trade Commission, established in 1914 to prevent unfair competition. The greatest source of unfair competition is the money in politics.

Local Governments higher consulting firms. Why? Maybe they donate generously to the in power party. 
State governors, Senators, and Assemblies, have war chest choked with donations from sources well beyond borders.  Our NJ Legislature works about 3 days per week on average.

U.S. Senate and Congress members have campaign sources that will provide enough money to finance campaigns that make working people envious of their life styles of travel, limousines and dinner accommodations. Elected office holders pass fund to fellow party members so they have supporting voices. All of this under the ‘Freedom of Speech” tenet.
How many days do they work? Did they work long hours on the topics that are ballyhooed as essential for you and a fair government. When laws, bills, or budgets are worked on, who does the work? Oh, they have staffs. 

They worked: https://www.thoughtco.com/average-number-of-legislative-days-3368250
 The House of Representatives has averaged 138 "legislative days" a year since 2001, according to records kept by the Library of Congress. That's about one day of work every three days, or fewer than three days a week. The Senate, on the other hand, was in session an average of 162 days a year over the same time period.”

Their salaries are three times the average household.
They recently arm waved a budget top put off their efforts until September 2017. A budget that provided support to organizations that have questionable reasons for existing. 

YOUR NEXT VOTE SHOULD BE FOR A SHORT TERM OFFICE HOLDER, AND VOICE AS WELL AS VOTE FOR TERM LIMITS.

Friday, May 19, 2017

I'm ashamed of the Republicans

There is a movement by Republican Senators and Representatives who have no guts.\\
They are abandoning the properly elected President of the United States because they do not have the guts to stand up to the opposition. Some are even trying to bring down Trump. If Trump were a Democrat there would be total support. Remember when opposition to Clinton resulted in his impeachment. The Democrats hung together and prevented Clinton's conviction,

Trump is not a true conservative, but he deserves Tea Party support. 
He recognizes our principles of smaller government and support of the Constitution, lower taxation. 

He is not likely  guilty of collusion with Russia. 

I say it is time to march on Washington! 
Call their offices.
McCain,  first Then

Alexander, Lamar - (R - TN)
Class II
455 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-4944

Baldwin, Tammy - (D - WI)
Class I
709 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-5653

Barrasso, John - (R - WY)
Class I
307 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-6441

Class III
261 Russell Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-5852

Class III
706 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-2823

Blunt, Roy - (R - MO)
Class III
260 Russell Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-5721

Booker, Cory A. - (D - NJ)
Class II
359 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-3224

Boozman, John - (R - AR)
Class III
141 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-4843

Brown, Sherrod - (D - OH)
Class I
713 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-2315

Burr, Richard - (R - NC)
Class III
217 Russell Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-3154

Cantwell, Maria - (D - WA)
Class I
511 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-3441

Class II
172 Russell Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-6472

Class I
509 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-4524

Carper, Thomas R. - (D - DE)
Class I
513 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-2441

Class I
393 Russell Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-6324

Cassidy, Bill - (R - LA)
Class II
520 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-5824

Cochran, Thad - (R - MS)
Class II
113 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-5054

Collins, Susan M. - (R - ME)
Class II
413 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-2523

Class II
127A Russell Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-5042

Corker, Bob - (R - TN)
Class I
425 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-3344

Cornyn, John - (R - TX)
Class II
517 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-2934

Class III
204 Russell Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-3542

Cotton, Tom - (R - AR)
Class II
124 Russell Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-2353

Crapo, Mike - (R - ID)
Class III
239 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-6142

Cruz, Ted - (R - TX)
Class I
404 Russell Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-5922

Daines, Steve - (R - MT)
Class II
320 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-2651

Donnelly, Joe - (D - IN)
Class I
720 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-4814

Duckworth, Tammy - (D - IL)
Class III
524 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-2854

Class II
711 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-2152

Enzi, Michael B. - (R - WY)
Class II
379A Russell Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-3424

Ernst, Joni - (R - IA)
Class II
111 Russell Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-3254

Feinstein, Dianne - (D - CA)
Class I
331 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-3841

Fischer, Deb - (R - NE)
Class I
454 Russell Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-6551

Flake, Jeff - (R - AZ)
Class I
413 Russell Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-4521

Franken, Al - (D - MN)
Class II
309 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-5641

Gardner, Cory - (R - CO)
Class II
354 Russell Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-5941

Class I
478 Russell Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-4451

Graham, Lindsey - (R - SC)
Class II
290 Russell Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-5972

Grassley, Chuck - (R - IA)
Class III
135 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-3744

Harris, Kamala D. - (D - CA)
Class III
112 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-3553

Class III
330 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-3324

Hatch, Orrin G. - (R - UT)
Class I
104 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-5251

Heinrich, Martin - (D - NM)
Class I
303 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-5521

Heitkamp, Heidi - (D - ND)
Class I
516 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-2043

Heller, Dean - (R - NV)
Class I
324 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-6244

Hirono, Mazie K. - (D - HI)
Class I
730 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-6361

Hoeven, John - (R - ND)
Class III
338 Russell Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-2551

Inhofe, James M. - (R - OK)
Class II
205 Russell Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-4721

Isakson, Johnny - (R - GA)
Class III
131 Russell Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-3643

Johnson, Ron - (R - WI)
Class III
328 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-5323

Kaine, Tim - (D - VA)
Class I
231 Russell Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-4024

Kennedy, John - (R - LA)
Class III
383 Russell Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-4623

Class I
133 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-5344

Klobuchar, Amy - (D - MN)
Class I
302 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-3244

Lankford, James - (R - OK)
Class III
316 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-5754

Leahy, Patrick J. - (D - VT)
Class III
437 Russell Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-4242

Lee, Mike - (R - UT)
Class III
361A Russell Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-5444

Manchin, Joe, III - (D - WV)
Class I
306 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-3954

Markey, Edward J. - (D - MA)
Class II
255 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-2742

McCain, John - (R - AZ)
Class III
218 Russell Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-2235

McCaskill, Claire - (D - MO)
Class I
503 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-6154

McConnell, Mitch - (R - KY)
Class II
317 Russell Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-2541

Menendez, Robert - (D - NJ)
Class I
528 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-4744

Merkley, Jeff - (D - OR)
Class II
313 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-3753

Moran, Jerry - (R - KS)
Class III
521 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-6521

Murkowski, Lisa - (R - AK)
Class III
522 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-6665

Class I
136 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-4041

Murray, Patty - (D - WA)
Class III
154 Russell Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-2621

Nelson, Bill - (D - FL)
Class I
716 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-5274

Paul, Rand - (R - KY)
Class III
167 Russell Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-4343

Perdue, David - (R - GA)
Class II
455 Russell Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-3521

Peters, Gary C. - (D - MI)
Class II
724 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-6221

Portman, Rob - (R - OH)
Class III
448 Russell Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-3353

Reed, Jack - (D - RI)
Class II
728 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-4642

Risch, James E. - (R - ID)
Class II
483 Russell Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-2752

Roberts, Pat - (R - KS)
Class II
109 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-4774

Rounds, Mike - (R - SD)
Class II
502 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-5842

Rubio, Marco - (R - FL)
Class III
284 Russell Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-3041

Sanders, Bernard - (I - VT)
Class I
332 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-5141

Sasse, Ben - (R - NE)
Class II
136 Russell Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-4224

Schatz, Brian - (D - HI)
Class III
722 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-3934

Class III
322 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-6542

Scott, Tim - (R - SC)
Class III
717 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-6121

Shaheen, Jeanne - (D - NH)
Class II
506 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-2841

Class III
304 Russell Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-5744

Stabenow, Debbie - (D - MI)
Class I
731 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-4822

Strange, Luther - (R - AL)
Class II
326 Russell Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-4124

Sullivan, Dan - (R - AK)
Class II
702 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-3004

Tester, Jon - (D - MT)
Class I
311 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-2644

Thune, John - (R - SD)
Class III
511 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-2321

Tillis, Thom - (R - NC)
Class II
185 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-6342

Class III
248 Russell Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-4254

Udall, Tom - (D - NM)
Class II
531 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-6621

Van Hollen, Chris - (D - MD)
Class III
110 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-4654

Warner, Mark R. - (D - VA)
Class II
703 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-2023

Warren, Elizabeth - (D - MA)
Class I
317 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-4543

Class I
530 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-2921

Wicker, Roger F. - (R - MS)
Class I
555 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-6253

Wyden, Ron - (D - OR)
Class III
221 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-5244

Young, Todd - (R - IN)
Class III
400 Russell Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510
(202) 224-5623