Dear Patriot,
News broke on Monday that House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) might not serve another full two-year term with the gavel. Whether Boehner gives up the Speaker’s chair tomorrow or a year from tomorrow, it will be a victory for conservatives who cherish personal freedom, economic freedom and a debt-free future.
By all means, Mr. Speaker, if your heart’s not in this, just leave now and avoid the rush.
Regardless of the date of any potential early departure, Boehner’s legacy will be one of capitulation and shame with conservative Americans. In 2013, John Boehner promised that the next time a debt-ceiling bill came up, he would exact concessions from the Obama Administration and Harry Reid’s Senate. He made it all the way to February of this year before he folded up like a lounge chair.
Of course, the notion that Boehner might not serve another, full two-year term in the chair leads many to think his last hurrah will be an amnesty bill. At one time, Boehner said amnesty was a non-starter this Congress. Then, he publicly went out of his way to mock conservatives who believe citizenship should actually mean something. Who doesn’t see another betrayal coming? I believe the man cannot be trusted.
In his undistinguished time as head of the majority party, John Boehner has seemingly taken glee in antagonizing Constitution-loving, conservative citizens. He started by gutting the Republican Study Committee, and then stripped aggressive conservatives like Reps. Justin Amash and Tim Huelskamp of plum committee assignments. His leadership team consists of moderates who would rather curry favor with the media than defend Constitutional principles.
The Tea Party movement made it possible for John Boehner to become Speaker of the House in 2010. He’s repaid our support, time and again, with a thumb to our eye. Don’t linger on our account, John.
Don’t mock. Don’t cry. Just leave.
Sincerely,
Jenny Beth Martin
Co-Founder, Tea Party Patriots
OUR COUNTRY IS TOO PRECIOUS TO LEAVE IT TO THE BUREAUCRATS, RINO's, TALKING HEADS. REPUBLICANS MUST READ THE 'DECLARATION OF INDEPENDANCE' AND OUR 'UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION..
Tuesday, May 13, 2014
The UN Takeover of New Jersey
MEETING IN MAY
Date: May 28, 2014
Time: 7:00 - 8:30
Place: Gloucester County Library, Mullica Hill Branch, 389 Wolfert Station Road; Mullica Hill, NJ 08062
Guest Speaker: Gerry Grabinski, speaking about Sustainable NJ Development
The
UN Takeover of New Jersey
Over the last 41 years there has been a
confluence of programs and organizations that are promoting the idea of "sustainable development." Do you REALLY
know what sustainable development means, where it came from, who came up with
the concept, what it currently is doing, where it is going, and more
importantly, how it could affect the folks in your area?
Sustainable development is a world-wide movement
that was created by the UN when it developed a centralized-planning program
called Agenda 21, which is designed to take global control of the environment,
i.e., land, air, water, energy and people.
Agenda 21 is being implemented in the USA by surrogate
organizations, primarily, ICLEI - Local Governments for Sustainability
who has taken the lead in promoting sustainable development at the state-wide and
municipality levels (Local Agenda 21) as well as by environmental Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs).
Unfortunately, NJ is the only state that
has seriously embraced "sustainable development" with the
creation in 2009 of a 501(c)3 organization called "Sustainable Jersey"
(SJ), which is promoting the resources of ICLEI and Agenda 21. The nice
sounding SJ phrases of "clean water," "clean air,"
toxic-free soil," "abundant and clean energy," and "happy
people" along with "potential" grant money has caused many local
officials to say "yes" to Sustainable Jersey. Unfortunately, many NJ Mayors
and Town Councils who signed up with SJ have not "done their
homework" to the detriment of their resident's children and grandchildren.
In my factual and sourced slide presentation
I will show you, specifically, how the UN, ICLEI and SJ are inextricably linked
to Agenda 21. Then, the decision on how you go about getting your Township from
joining SJ will be discussed.
Gerry
Grabinski
Important message on rule of Tea Party Conduct
Here is an official message from Tea Party Patriots concerning Operation American Spring. TPP is in no way connected to this event, nor does it encourage participation in this event by any Tea Party chapter.
The bedrock principles of the Tea Party Patriots are enshrined in the Constitution of the United States. It is a document which, by design, fosters thoughtful government action and transition of power. Today and in times past, the nation has faced real and perceived usurpations of the Constitution, and Tea Party Patriots are dedicated to fighting for constitutional integrity. In doing so, we also recognize that this fight must necessarily be conducted within the framework of the Constitution itself.
It is for these reasons that we reject any use of violence by any parties in pursuit of the goals of personal freedom, economic freedom and a debt-free future. We welcome spirited debate and discussion of the critical issues facing our nation, and recognize that incendiary language does a disservice this debate.
The Tea Party Patriots are not affiliated with the May 16, 2014, "Operation American Spring," nor are we participating in this event. As with any demonstration, we ask our members to exercise due diligence in evaluating their own participation in this event.
Also, please check out the Tea Party Patriots website. Please read, "What we stand for...", and go to learn more to see and learn the principles of the movement.
They are: Personal Freedom, Economic Freedom, and Debt Free Future. Please commit the purpose and principles to memory.
Thank you,
Rose
Sunday, April 27, 2014
A CALL FOR ACTION
To view this email as a web page, go here.
|
The last thing most politicians and lobbyists looking in Trenton want to see is an army of taxpayers at the statehouse demanding them to stop wasting their money! And that’s just what we plan on doing!
 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Thursday, April 24, 2014
Next Meeting
We had our meeting Wednesday Night, April 23.
Your task for the fourth Wednesday of May is; bring yourself and try to bring two more people to the May Meeting.
The younger the better. Come, with or without.
We are fighting for the future of our country.
Bring young people.
Nuff said?
A friend posted this on another forum. What do you think? Do you agree with any of these?
Canada's Top Ten List of America's Stupidity
10) Only in America ... could politicians talk about the greed of the rich at a $35,000.00 a plate campaign fund-raising event.
9) Only in America ... could people claim that the government still discriminates against black Americans when they have a black President, a black Attorney General and roughly 20% of the federal workforce is black while only 14% of the population is black. 40+% of all federal entitlements goes to black Americans - 3X the rate that go to whites, 5X the rate that go to Hispanics!
8) Only in America ... could they have had the two people most responsible for our tax code, Timothy Geithner (the head of the Treasury Department) and Charles Rangel (who once ran the Ways and Means Committee), BOTH turn out to be tax cheats who are in favor of higher taxes.
7) Only in America ... can they have terrorists kill people in the name of Allah and have the media primarily react by fretting that Muslims might be harmed by the backlash.
6) Only in America ... would they make people who want to legally become American citizens wait for years in their home countries and pay tens of thousands of dollars for the privilege, while they discuss letting anyone who sneaks into the country illegally just 'magically' become American citizens.
5) Only in America ... could the people who believe in balancing the budget and sticking by the country's Constitution be thought of as "extremists."
4) Only in America ... could you need to present a driver's license to cash a check or buy alcohol, but not to vote.
3) Only in America ... could people demand the government investigate whether oil companies are gouging the public because the price of gas went up when the return on equity invested in a major U.S. oil company (Marathon Oil) is less than half of a company making tennis shoes (Nike).
2) Only in America ... could the government collect more tax dollars from the people than any nation in recorded history, still spend a Trillion dollars more than it has per year - for total spending of $7-Million PER MINUTE, and complain that it doesn't have nearly enough money.
1) Only in America ... could the rich people - who pay 86% of all income taxes - be accused of not paying their "fair share" by people who don't pay any income taxes at all.
Read more at http://www.liveleak....CQ1B4yb8qbEv.99
Read more: http://www.city-data.com/forum/politics-other-controversies/2033684-canadas-top-10-list-american-stupidity.html#ixzz2zo6j8fcm
Canada's Top Ten List of America's Stupidity
10) Only in America ... could politicians talk about the greed of the rich at a $35,000.00 a plate campaign fund-raising event.
9) Only in America ... could people claim that the government still discriminates against black Americans when they have a black President, a black Attorney General and roughly 20% of the federal workforce is black while only 14% of the population is black. 40+% of all federal entitlements goes to black Americans - 3X the rate that go to whites, 5X the rate that go to Hispanics!
8) Only in America ... could they have had the two people most responsible for our tax code, Timothy Geithner (the head of the Treasury Department) and Charles Rangel (who once ran the Ways and Means Committee), BOTH turn out to be tax cheats who are in favor of higher taxes.
7) Only in America ... can they have terrorists kill people in the name of Allah and have the media primarily react by fretting that Muslims might be harmed by the backlash.
6) Only in America ... would they make people who want to legally become American citizens wait for years in their home countries and pay tens of thousands of dollars for the privilege, while they discuss letting anyone who sneaks into the country illegally just 'magically' become American citizens.
5) Only in America ... could the people who believe in balancing the budget and sticking by the country's Constitution be thought of as "extremists."
4) Only in America ... could you need to present a driver's license to cash a check or buy alcohol, but not to vote.
3) Only in America ... could people demand the government investigate whether oil companies are gouging the public because the price of gas went up when the return on equity invested in a major U.S. oil company (Marathon Oil) is less than half of a company making tennis shoes (Nike).
2) Only in America ... could the government collect more tax dollars from the people than any nation in recorded history, still spend a Trillion dollars more than it has per year - for total spending of $7-Million PER MINUTE, and complain that it doesn't have nearly enough money.
1) Only in America ... could the rich people - who pay 86% of all income taxes - be accused of not paying their "fair share" by people who don't pay any income taxes at all.
Read more at http://www.liveleak....CQ1B4yb8qbEv.99
Read more: http://www.city-data.com/forum/politics-other-controversies/2033684-canadas-top-10-list-american-stupidity.html#ixzz2zo6j8fcm
Wednesday, April 23, 2014
Big Brother's, B.L.M., Are they grabbing again?
Texas officials are raising alarm that the Bureau of Land Management, on the heels of its dust-up with Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy, might be eyeing a massive land grab in northern Texas.
The under-the-radar issue has caught the attention of Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott, who fired off a letter on Tuesday to BLM Director Neil Kornze saying the agency “appears to be threatening” the private property rights of “hard-working Texans.”
“Decisions of this magnitude must not be made inside a bureaucratic black box,” wrote Abbott, also a Republican gubernatorial candidate.
Copy this link and check it out on Foxnews.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/04/22/republicans-warn-blm-eyeing-land-grab-along-texas-oklahoma-border/
Tuesday, April 22, 2014
Have you noticed Pennsylvania's Primary Adds?
Watch TV and you become glad you are not living in 'Taxilvania'. If they are not spending great sums of money on Primary Election Adds, they all find a target in proposing to spend more tax payers moneys on Education. How much is needed?
Why do these, Democrats find taxes so attractive? What is the 'unknown' to these candidates is how much is already being spent on education. But also common theme is taxing the drillers for 'Fracking'.
But even more fundamental is that if they tax fracking who will pay for the tax. That is correct, the drillers will raise the cost of the product and pass the cost on to the consumers.
There is one candidate who is saying; "- you must vote for me because I am a woman and the government of Pennsylvania is an old boys club."
The Primary costs are telling us there is a fortune to be earned if you became a governor of PA. or any state.
Why do these, Democrats find taxes so attractive? What is the 'unknown' to these candidates is how much is already being spent on education. But also common theme is taxing the drillers for 'Fracking'.
But even more fundamental is that if they tax fracking who will pay for the tax. That is correct, the drillers will raise the cost of the product and pass the cost on to the consumers.
There is one candidate who is saying; "- you must vote for me because I am a woman and the government of Pennsylvania is an old boys club."
The Primary costs are telling us there is a fortune to be earned if you became a governor of PA. or any state.
Monday, April 21, 2014
Real Estate Transfer Tax, Pass on to your Senator & Assembly People
To: Senator Madden, Assemblyman Moriarty & Assmblywoman Mosquers
American Citizens Lobbyist Group
Monday, 4.21.14
Budget Time in
Reduce or Eliminate the Real Estate Transfer Fee
ASSEMBLY,
No. 389 Eliminates general purpose, supplemental and mansion realty transfer fees.
PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2014 SESSION
Sponsored by: Assemblyman ANTHONY M.
BUCCO, District 25 (Morris and Somerset )
Assemblyman MICHAEL PATRICK CARROLL, District
25 (Morris and Somerset
Co-Sponsored by: Assemblymen Rumana and C.A.Brown
In 1968 the State of New
Jersey
Jarrod Grasso, chief executive of the New Jersey
Association of Realtors, said the fees were “nominal” until 2003 and 2004, when
former Gov. Jim McGreevy and the state Legislature increased them in
back-to-back years.
This nominal fee is no longer nominal. As usual NJ has
some of the highest transfer fees in the country. Instead of being used to
track real estate transactions, the fees now are put into the general fund. These
transfer fees make up the seventh-largest source of revenue for the state.
Sell your home for $300,000 — the median sale price in
the state last month — and you’ll owe the New Jersey
The out of control spending by this
state has led our former legislators to be hoodwinked into driving this fee up
so high that current legislators are saying we cannot eliminate or reduce this
fee because we need it to pay for beach erosion projects.
These funds were not earmarked for beach erosion or for the general fund; they were earmarked for real estate transactions.
Thirteen states have no Real Estate Transfer Fee.
AK, ID, IN, LA, MS, MT, MO, ND, NM, OR, TX, UT AND WY. AZ has a $2.00 fee per transaction.
These funds were not earmarked for beach erosion or for the general fund; they were earmarked for real estate transactions.
Thirteen states have no Real Estate Transfer Fee.
AK, ID, IN, LA, MS, MT, MO, ND, NM, OR, TX, UT AND WY. AZ has a $2.00 fee per transaction.
We have three suggestions.
Reduce the rate significantly, charge a flat fee like AZ regardless of the sale price of your house or eliminate the Fee altogether.
Reduce the rate significantly, charge a flat fee like AZ regardless of the sale price of your house or eliminate the Fee altogether.
And then stop wasteful and unnecessary spending.
American Citizens Lobbyist Group-NJ
Basil Mantagas, NJ Director, 646-825-0776, bmantagas.aclg@gmail.com
4.21.14, Budget time in Trenton Part 4
The NY TImes is begining to attmpt yo decide who the Republicans will run
JEB GETS FRONTRUNNER SCRUTINY FROM NYT
NYT gives former Gov. Jeb Bush, R-Fla., the frontrunner treatment, running a fine comb through the activities of the firms that have paid him to lend them his name since leaving Tallahassee: “…Mr. Bush left public office seven years ago with a net worth of $1.3 million and an unapologetic determination to expand his wealth, telling friends that his finances had suffered during his time in government… Mr. Bush participated in the fevered, last-ditch efforts to prop up Lehman Brothers, a Wall Street bank weighed down by toxic mortgage-backed securities. … And in a stint that could complicate his appeal to conservatives, Mr. Bush serves as a paid director to Tenet Health Care, the giant hospital owner, which supported President Obama’s Affordable Care Act, aggressively encouraged Americans to sign up for insurance under the program and trumpeted the legislation as a boon to the company’s finances…”
THE CANDIDATE WE DEFINITELY AND DEFIANTLY DO NOT WANT
NYT gives former Gov. Jeb Bush, R-Fla., the frontrunner treatment, running a fine comb through the activities of the firms that have paid him to lend them his name since leaving Tallahassee: “…Mr. Bush left public office seven years ago with a net worth of $1.3 million and an unapologetic determination to expand his wealth, telling friends that his finances had suffered during his time in government… Mr. Bush participated in the fevered, last-ditch efforts to prop up Lehman Brothers, a Wall Street bank weighed down by toxic mortgage-backed securities. … And in a stint that could complicate his appeal to conservatives, Mr. Bush serves as a paid director to Tenet Health Care, the giant hospital owner, which supported President Obama’s Affordable Care Act, aggressively encouraged Americans to sign up for insurance under the program and trumpeted the legislation as a boon to the company’s finances…”
THE CANDIDATE WE DEFINITELY AND DEFIANTLY DO NOT WANT
Sunday, April 20, 2014
SUING THE I R S, yea , yea , yea!
1
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
Wednesday, April 16, 2014
How many workers, Remember my letter form 2-6-14
February 6, 2014
Dear
Editor
Are we
running out of the support for Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and
Medicare Part D, Unemployment Insurance? These programs require mandatory contributions
from a population of workers and employers of a number larger than the number receiving
benefits. The Affordable Care Act is similarly based. We need large numbers of
younger and healthier citizens to procure insurance in sufficient numbers sufficient
to support the claims. The total numbers of workers are shrinking as a
percentage of the population. The working population is shrinking because of;
our recession, aging population, and the lower birth rate. The ratio of workers
to non-workers is falling below the sustainable numbers of contributors. The
ACA has been impacted by the lack of enrollees. But the Federal government is spending
tax monies to advertise for enrollees into the ACA. At what cost? Do we think
increase immigration will increase the number of contributors if there are no
increases in employment?
The
impact by the ACA is because working hours are being reduced. The resulting
lower income will lower contributions. Are increased contributions an answer? Our
governments, Federal and State, need to enact steps that improve private
business employment, reduce the assaults on state budgets, and reduce
dependency on government supports. Local governments pay into federal and state
supported plans. Increased employment by businesses will overcome some of the
short fall of the payroll and employer contributions. Increased government
employment will increase our taxes.
Gerald Keer
1010 Merrymount North
Turnersville, NJ 08012
Home 856 228 2123
Cell 609 413 1325
NOW READ THIS
In 2012, according to the Census Bureau, approximately 103,087,000 people worked full-time, year-round in the United States. "A full-time, year-round worker is a person who worked 35 or more hours per week (full time) and 50 or more weeks during the previous calendar year (year round)," said the Census Bureau. "For school personnel, summer vacation is counted as weeks worked if they are scheduled to return to their job in the fall."
Of the 103,087,000 full-time, year-round workers, 16,606,000 worked for the government. That included 12,597,000 who worked for state and local government and 4,009,000 who worked for the federal government.
The 86,429,000 Americans who worked full-time, year-round in the private sector, included 77,392,000 employed as wage and salary workers for private-sector enterprises and 9,037,000 who worked for themselves. (There were also approximately 52,000 who worked full-time, year-round without pay in a family enterprise.)
At first glance, 86,429,000 might seem like a healthy population of full-time private-sector workers. But then you need to look at what they are up against.
The Census Bureau also estimates the size of the benefit-receiving population.
http://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/terence-p-jeffrey/86m-full-time-private-sector-workers-sustain-148m-benefit-takers
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)