The conservative movement and varied
wings of the Republican party have always had their troubles with the
trending and ultimate nominee—usually right up until the nomination.
This year is different. Many conservative intellectuals and party
regulars are still throwing their brickbats at him. And yet, the
problems and complaints about the nominee seem much the same as in
previous years, if not even less significant.
Six years before he ran for president,
Mitt Romney ran for Governor of Massachusetts as a pro-choice, pro
gay-rights Republican. Four years after his first run at the presidency
he was the nominee. And unity in the movement and party was had. When
Rudy Giuliani ran for president, many conservatives supported him,
despite his also being pro-choice, pro-gay rights, an endorser of Mario
Cuomo, and a man with not a few personal “family values” issues.
Ultimately, he became a go-to conservative and a hero of the movement.
Perhaps the movement and party that
supported Romney and Giuliani at various times thought: “Conservative
enough.” Or, perhaps they thought: “Better than the alternative.” Or,
perhaps they knew what is no longer taught in Poli Sci 101 but has
always been true: Republican presidents empty think tanks and staff
themselves to their right; Democratic presidents empty think tanks and
staff themselves to their left. As we all learned a long time ago,
“personnel is policy.”
Somehow, today, those rules of general understanding and practice no longer abide for too many in the movement.
Concerns over the conservative
credentials of the likes of Giuliani and Romney, while ultimately buried
and suppressed in favor of the larger cause—the country and the
world—existed for other candidates, too. It’s a distant memory now, but
there was a lot of conservative-movement doubt about George W. Bush—his
attack on Robert Bork, Robert Bork’s response, the whole notion of
“compassionate conservatism,” and more. Some may even remember Nancy
Reagan’s 1992 comment “Kinder than who?” after George H.W. Bush spoke of
wanting a “kinder, gentler” nation.
End of day, whatever the reasons, the movement and party united—perhaps wrapping itself around the old formulation of William F. Buckley’s, “He’s conservative, but he’s not a conservative.” And as between conservative nominees and liberal ones: good enough.
Now comes Donald Trump....
Read the rest of this excellent piece by Seth Leibsohn here at American Greatness
No comments:
Post a Comment