If a person tells you something with a certain
amount of surety do you assume there is a promise or fact? If the person is of national
authority and repeatedly assures you that something will come to pass I assume
there is a promise.
In retrospect we had a border guard murdered by
people taking advantage of weapons sold under the fast and furious program. President assured us that he would investigate and find out who authorized
fast and furious.
Green energy loans totaled billions. We had
millions contributed to Solyndra and like solar corporations that went
bankrupt. We were assured by our President the government would get to the
bottom of the fiasco.
We heard of the IRS using their authority to
subject conservatives to unnecessary delay and scrutiny. We were assured, by
our President, the matter would be reviewed in detail and if guilty, discipline
would be exercised on the responsible party/ies.
We have been told the President will get to the
bottom of telephone and e-mail recordings by NSA.
There was a raid in Benghazi that resulted in the
death of the American Ambassador to Lybia and others. We were told by our President’s ambassador to the United
Nations, that the raid in Benghazi was the result of an anti-Islam video. Later
we were told, by our President, the culprits would be brought to justice. Various
stories of possible military rescue missions have been reported and denied. Have we been
given a full finding of facts and actions? The witnesses have not been
permitted to testify.
Oh well, we are sure we can keep our health care
insurance and doctor. Or is that left up to the Secretary of Health and Human
Services. Remember how she worked closely to improve services to children
except for lung transplants. She has issued the criteria that insurance companies
must meet.
What difference does it make?
What difference does it make?
No comments:
Post a Comment